Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1206

reference
815-tree-1
name
1206
tree-preservation-order

undefined

815-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.008548 50.889351)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.008463 50.889342,-1.008467 50.889359,-1.008478 50.889374,-1.008497 50.889386,-1.008521 50.889394,-1.008547 50.889397,-1.008573 50.889394,-1.008597 50.889387,-1.008616 50.889375,-1.008629 50.889360,-1.008633 50.889343,-1.008630 50.889327,-1.008618 50.889311,-1.008599 50.889299,-1.008576 50.889291,-1.008549 50.889289,-1.008523 50.889291,-1.008499 50.889299,-1.008480 50.889310,-1.008467 50.889325,-1.008463 50.889342)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL